Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e real world range comparison

    As per MIDC, the Harrier EV has a single-charge range of 622km, while the XEV 9e returns 656km.

    Published On Aug 21, 2025 08:00:00 AM

    35,740 Views

    Mahindra XEV 9e and Tata Harrier EV

    Both the Tata Harrier EV and the Mahindra XEV 9e are flagship electric SUV models of their respective brands. These 5-seaters are closely priced as well, but the real question is: which of them delivers more range in real-world conditions? To find that out, let’s compare their top models.

    Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e prices

    Harrier EV is more affordable by Rs 1.5 lakh-2 lakh

    Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e top model prices
    Tata Harrier EV variantPrice (Rs, lakh)Mahindra XEV 9e variantPrice (Rs, lakh)
    Empowered AWD28.99Pack Three30.50
    Empowered AWD + 7.2kW AC charger29.48Pack Three + 7.2kW AC charger31
    --Pack Three + 11.2kW AC charger31.25

    Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e specs

    XEV 9e is RWD, while the Harrier EV gets an AWD setup

    The Tata Harrier EV and Mahindra XEV 9e trade blows in different areas – the Harrier’s dual-motor setup makes a relatively superior horsepower figure, and it’s also quicker to hit 100kph from rest. The Mahindra, though, features a slightly larger battery pack, and its rear-wheel-drive layout plus lesser power output help in giving it more range (claimed). Additionally, the Mahindra SUV is faster to charge with a DC charger due to its higher charging speed compatibility; the Tata has a quicker AC charging time.

    Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e top model specs
    SUVTata Harrier EV Empowered AWDMahindra XEV 9e Pack Three
    Battery size (kWh)7579
    Electric motor setupDual motors, front and rearSingle motor, rear
    Power (hp)313286
    Torque (Nm)504380
    GearboxSingle-speed automaticSingle-speed automatic
    Kerb weight (kg)2,3352,201
    MIDC range (km)*622656
    Claimed 0-100kph time (s)6.36.8
    7.2kW AC charging time (hrs)10.711.7
    11.2kW AC charging time (hrs)-8
    DC charging time (mins)25 (with 120kW charger)20 (with 180kW charger)

    Tata Harrier EV vs Mahindra XEV 9e real world range

    XEV 9e has superior city and highway ranges

    Tata Harrier EV and Mahindra XEV 9e range comparison

    Our tests put the electric Harrier’s combined real-world range at about 401km (city 409km, highway 393km), while the XEV 9e managed 456km combined (city 425km, highway 488km). That’s about a 55km advantage for the Mahindra overall; the gap in the city range is small at 16km, but it’s much wider on the highway, stretching to 95km. Both SUVs ran in their most efficient drive modes and similar regen levels, but the Harrier EV’s higher kerb weight, dual-motor setup with a higher power output and smaller battery size explain why its real-world range is much lower than the XEV 9e.

    Autocar Indias range testing protocol

    For our real-world range tests, we start with the battery fully charged and tyre pressures set as per the manufacturer’s recommendation. The cars are driven on a fixed loop, covering both city and highway stretches, while maintaining set average speeds. Range is calculated based on the percentage of charge consumed. We keep the AC at 22deg C in auto mode and use other features like the music system, lights and ventilated seats whenever needed, just as a regular user would. This way, these tests are consistent and give a clear idea of what to expect in daily use.

    Also see:

    Top 5 highest mileage cars in India

    Tata Harrier EV real world range tested, explained

    Mahindra XEV 9e real world range tested, explained

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Poll of the month

    What is your biggest concern with the roll out of E20 fuel?

    Loss of fuel efficiency

     

    19.57%

    Long term corrosion of mechanical components

     

    69.16%

    I am not concerned, on the whole this is a good move

     

    11.27%

    Total Votes : 1446
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe